|
||
|
|
|
||||
|
THE PRACTICAL RESEARCHER SHAUN BOWLER Numerous studies
attempt to assess direct democracy's impact on state policy using measures
of direct democracy based on dummy variables or the frequency with which
initiatives appear on a state's ballots. We offer an alternative to these
measures that accounts for how rules governing the initiative process
vary among the states. We replicate several studies using different measures
of direct democracy and demonstrate that the results of hypothesis tests
can be contingent on how these institutions are measured. We contend that
commonly used dummy variable measures of state direct democracy have validity
problems and that hypothesis tests using such measures produce imprecise
estimates of the initiative's effect on policy. |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
| Home | Issue Index |
| © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois |
|